MIT report says it didn’t seek federal charges against Aaron Swartz - cainwhiseve

The Massachusetts Institute of Engineering never wanted a government prosecution of Henry Louis Aaron Swartz, the scheduling prodigy who was hot with stealing millions of academic papers from an online archive at MIT, according to a report by the institute.

Swartz (higher up) loving self-annihilation in January while facing federal charges including computer intrusion, electrify sham, and data theft, which could have led to a sentence of 35 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

The case has led to protests against what critics called an overly aggressive prosecution and calls away lawmakers to change the Electronic computer Humbug and Abuse Human activity. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder by and by said the government ne'er intended for Swartz to serve more than a few months in prison house.

The report, which was requested away MIT President Rafael Reif in January, was issued on Tuesday, the bring said in a pressing release. IT cleared MIT of whatsoever error just raised questions about whether the constitute should have been more actively involved. The report was prepared later on conversations with about 50 mass, including faculty, students, alumni, staff, constabulary officers and lawyers, and Swartz's family and friends.

MIT remained neutral on Swartz's case from the clip of his arrest in January 2011 until his last in January 2022, never making public statements about the merits of the case or whether information technology should proceed, the report set up.

The establish didn't postulation that federal agents get convoluted in the investigation or federal charges be brought against him. The institute didn't judge to influence the prosecutor's decisions along the case, other than saying the government shouldn't assume that Massachusetts Institute of Technology wanted Swartz to go to jail, it said.

Swartz was polar with downloading more than four meg academic articles from the subscription-based JSTOR service, allegedly for the purpose of making them available free of charge. Critics, including some prominent Internet scholars, aforementioned the federal charges against him and the possible maximum penalty they could have carried were out of proportion to the crime.

MIT and JSTOR ascertained massive downloading of articles beginning in September 2010 and identified it as coming from a laptop computer connected to MIT's network. But they didn't learn that Swartz was responsible the downloading until later on his initial arrest for breaking and entering, the report ground.

MIT called in a Cambridge Law tec to help with its probe of the downloading, and that tec arrived on campus with a U.S. Secret Service agent, but Massachusetts Institute of Technology didn't request the Secret Service's intimacy, IT same.

But MIT's neutrality posture didn't take into consideration Swartz's contributions to Internet technology, and it didn't contract into consideration the background of insurance issues "in which MIT multitude ingest traditionally been passionate leaders," the paper aforesaid.

"Massachusetts Institute of Technology uncomprehensible an opportunity to demonstrate the leading that we pride ourselves on," the report said.

"From studying this review of MIT's role, I am sure that Massachusetts Institute of Technology's decisions were sound, fit, and made in good faith," Reif wrote in a letter released Tuesday. "I have detected from many in our community World Health Organization believe our actions were fitting and justified. Others feel other than."

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/453135/mit-report-says-it-didnt-seek-federal-charges-against-aaron-swartz.html

Posted by: cainwhiseve.blogspot.com